Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/681
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGono, Robert K.-
dc.contributor.authorChireshe, Fortunate-
dc.contributor.authorMuzondiwa, John V.-
dc.contributor.authorSichewo, Petronilla-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-18T11:54:12Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-18T11:54:12Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/681-
dc.description.abstractInfestations with ticks have an important economic impact on the cattle industry worldwide and resistance to acaricides has become a widespread phenomenon. To optimize their treatment strategy, farmers need to know if and against which classes of livestock, potential acaricide-resistance does occur. Amitraz is a rapidly acting acaricide that has been in use for the control of cattle ticks for more than 30 years. Resistance against amitraz was first reported in Boophilus microplus in Australia in 1980 but has been slow to spread in comparison to resistance against synthetic pyrethroids. There is little reliable information on the prevalence of amitraz resistance in southern Africa. Risk factors have been identified, but the small sample sizes in the studies that have attempted to identify risk factors using survey data suggest caution in their interpretation. Regional variation in prevalence has been reported, as has a positive relationship with frequency of acaricide application. There is evidence to suggest that in Southern Africa, amitraz resistance might have emerged in isolated areas and has been disseminated by cattle movements. The objective of the current study was to assess the susceptibility of field tick populations originating from Mazowe district in Zimbabwe using the Larval Packet Test to Amitraz. The proportions of the ticks collected from the animals revealed that 61% were Rhipicephalus (Boophilus} microplus a one host tick. 31% were the Rhipicephalus appendiculutus, a three host tick. The resistance ratios at concentrations inducing at least 80% and 99% mortality were used to detect established and emerging resistance. There was no evidence of resistance to amitraz in the. Rhipicephalus appendiculutus and the Rhipicephalus B microplus tick species. The Larval Packet Test proved to be a suitable test to evaluate the susceptibility of R. microplus field populations to amitraz.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMidlands State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMidlands State University Journal of Science, Agriculture and Technology;Vol. 5 (1); p. 111-120-
dc.subjectAcaricide resistance, larval packet test, rhipicephalus B microplusen_US
dc.titleAcaricide resistance in two tick species of veterinary importance in Zimbabwe: a case study of tick resistance to amitraz in the Mazowe districten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
gono.pdf5.43 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Download(s)

78
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.