Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6635
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuzingili Taruvingaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-15T14:09:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-15T14:09:34Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6635-
dc.description.abstractThe study investigates factors contributing to the low level of skill in the adoption of quantitative approaches in clinical social work aligned students’ thesis. We collected the data over a five-year period, spanning from 2019 to 2023. The data was collected from a sample of (n = 264) social work students who had completed a Bachelor of Social Work with Honors Degree or a Master of Social Work, all with research topics related to clinical social work. A self-administered questionnaire was used as a research instrument to measure the influence of four major items: attitudes and beliefs, knowledge and skills, institutional factors, and confidence, in predicting the adoption of quantitative approaches in clinical social work aligned students’ thesis. A bivariate Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that knowledge and skills had a moderately negative correlation at ρ < 0.05 with the use of quantitative approaches in social work students’ thesis, while attitudes and beliefs, institutional factors, and confidence had a strong positive correlation (ρ < 0.01). A regression analysis showed that all major dimensions-attitudes and beliefs and knowledge and skills were both statistically significant at (ρ < 0.05), while institutional factors and confidence at ρ < 0.01. The 5th regression model combined all four factors, and the model was statistically significant at ρ < 0.01. The study called for clinical social work education and training to empower students to adopt a positive attitude towards quantitative research, foster a culture of institutional support and collaboration, and enhance students’ confidence in conducting quantitative research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Social Work Journalen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative researchen_US
dc.subjectPredictorsen_US
dc.subjectMethodological choiceen_US
dc.subjectClinical social worken_US
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.titlePredictors of limited quantitative methodology use in clinical social work research: A survey of Zimbabwean social work studentsen_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-025-01001-z-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Social Work, Midlands State University, Harare, Zimbabwe; School of Social Work, Cnr Chinhoyi and Grant Street, Harare, Zimbabween_US
dc.relation.issn0091-1674en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Predictors of Limited Quantitative Methodology Use in Clinical Social Work Research.pdf72.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

86
checked on Aug 19, 2025

Download(s)

2
checked on Aug 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.