Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6609
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Muzingili Taruvinga | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-13T11:59:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-13T11:59:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6609 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The study investigates factors contributing to the low level of skill in the adoption of quantitative approaches in clinical social work aligned students’ thesis. We collected the data over a five-year period, spanning from 2019 to 2023. The data was collected from a sample of (n = 264) social work students who had completed a Bachelor of Social Work with Honors Degree or a Master of Social Work, all with research topics related to clinical social work. A self-administered questionnaire was used as a research instrument to measure the influence of four major items: attitudes and beliefs, knowledge and skills, institutional factors, and confidence, in predicting the adoption of quantitative approaches in clinical social work aligned students’ thesis. A bivariate Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that knowledge and skills had a moderately negative correlation at ρ < 0.05 with the use of quantitative approaches in social work students’ thesis, while attitudes and beliefs, institutional factors, and confidence had a strong positive correlation (ρ < 0.01). A regression analysis showed that all major dimensions-attitudes and beliefs and knowledge and skills were both statistically significant at (ρ < 0.05), while institutional factors and confidence at ρ < 0.01. The 5th regression model combined all four factors, and the model was statistically significant at ρ < 0.01. The study called for clinical social work education and training to empower students to adopt a positive attitude towards quantitative research, foster a culture of institutional support and collaboration, and enhance students’ confidence in conducting quantitative research. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Social Work Journal | en_US |
dc.subject | Quantitative research | en_US |
dc.subject | Predictors | en_US |
dc.subject | Methodological choice | en_US |
dc.subject | Clinical social work | en_US |
dc.subject | Zimbabwe | en_US |
dc.title | Predictors of limited quantitative methodology use in clinical social work research: A survey of Zimbabwean social work students | en_US |
dc.type | journal article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-025-01001-z | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10615-025-01001-z | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Department of Social Work, Midlands State University, Harare, Zimbabwe | en_US |
dc.relation.issn | 0091-1674 | en_US |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | journal article | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors of Limited Quantitative Methodology Use in Clinical Social Work Research.pdf | Abstract | 103.38 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.