Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6609
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuzingili Taruvingaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T11:59:00Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-13T11:59:00Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6609-
dc.description.abstractThe study investigates factors contributing to the low level of skill in the adoption of quantitative approaches in clinical social work aligned students’ thesis. We collected the data over a five-year period, spanning from 2019 to 2023. The data was collected from a sample of (n = 264) social work students who had completed a Bachelor of Social Work with Honors Degree or a Master of Social Work, all with research topics related to clinical social work. A self-administered questionnaire was used as a research instrument to measure the influence of four major items: attitudes and beliefs, knowledge and skills, institutional factors, and confidence, in predicting the adoption of quantitative approaches in clinical social work aligned students’ thesis. A bivariate Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that knowledge and skills had a moderately negative correlation at ρ < 0.05 with the use of quantitative approaches in social work students’ thesis, while attitudes and beliefs, institutional factors, and confidence had a strong positive correlation (ρ < 0.01). A regression analysis showed that all major dimensions-attitudes and beliefs and knowledge and skills were both statistically significant at (ρ < 0.05), while institutional factors and confidence at ρ < 0.01. The 5th regression model combined all four factors, and the model was statistically significant at ρ < 0.01. The study called for clinical social work education and training to empower students to adopt a positive attitude towards quantitative research, foster a culture of institutional support and collaboration, and enhance students’ confidence in conducting quantitative research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Social Work Journalen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative researchen_US
dc.subjectPredictorsen_US
dc.subjectMethodological choiceen_US
dc.subjectClinical social worken_US
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.titlePredictors of limited quantitative methodology use in clinical social work research: A survey of Zimbabwean social work studentsen_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-025-01001-z-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10615-025-01001-z-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Social Work, Midlands State University, Harare, Zimbabween_US
dc.relation.issn0091-1674en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypejournal article-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Predictors of Limited Quantitative Methodology Use in Clinical Social Work Research.pdfAbstract103.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on May 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.