Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5608
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShadreck Tanyanyiwaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T06:43:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-05T06:43:30Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-30-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5608-
dc.description.abstractLife is supposed to be a great teacher, but in the development field lessons have never been learnt because errors of decades ago continue being entrenched today, by more enlightened peopleThis paper deploys critic theories of rural development and community participation to explain why communities resist development projects. One such incident is community resistance to a donor-funded mega irrigation project in Nyangavi, Guruve, in Northern Zimbabwe. The community felt that the poverty alleviation project was imposed on them. The resilient modernisation’ thinking countered by people-centred ideas of development in Guruve promotes active participation of rural communities as subjects rather than objects of development. Resistance in this paper is underscored to highlight the lack of fit between rural development policy and the actual implementation on the ground and underscores rural communities’ agency as masters of their own destiny.National governments have explicit rural development policies that can help rural communities drive economies. However, these policies are ignored, for expedience purposes as officials futilely fast-track change that is meant to improve the standard of living of the poor. There appears to be selective use of community participation policies to suit certain conditions.This kind of development characterises most of Africa and development of billion-dollar projects throughout the world.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journals (A J)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Peace and Development Studiesen_US
dc.subjectCommunity-based rural developmenten_US
dc.subjectcommunityen_US
dc.subjectcommunity leadershipen_US
dc.subjectdecentralisationen_US
dc.subjectdevelopment, engagementen_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectirrigation, land reformen_US
dc.subjectmilitant leadersen_US
dc.subjectmodernisationen_US
dc.subjectrural developmenten_US
dc.subjectpolicyen_US
dc.subjectresistanceen_US
dc.subjectmobiliseen_US
dc.titleRural development: Lessons never learnten_US
dc.typeresearch articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5897/IJPDS2018.0319-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Development Studies, Faculty of Arts, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.en_US
dc.relation.issn2141-6621en_US
dc.description.volume9en_US
dc.description.issue4en_US
dc.description.startpage36en_US
dc.description.endpage52en_US
item.openairetyperesearch article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rural development.pdfAbstract54.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

100
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Download(s)

40
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.