Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5320
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPure Maswoswereen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark Makomborero Matsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNobuhle Sibandaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T10:45:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-20T10:45:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-31-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5320-
dc.description.abstractAn increasing number of disasters across the globe have prompted the creation of strategies for disaster risk reduction and resilience to save lives and property in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the New Urban Agenda (NUA). The 2030 Agenda calls for all development planning to simultaneously tackle disaster risk reduction and inclusiveness. This paper aims to remold urban planning for upcoming new towns in developing countries so that planners can be able to include indigenous knowledge systems in urban planning. The study was conducted in a new town, Gokwe, Zimbabwe, with a population of 8,118 from which a sample size of 229 was drawn using Cochran’s sample size determination formula and the 30% rule. A mixed-methods analytic case study was conducted to evaluate the potential of the town’s planning processes in preventing natural and human-induced disasters. The study used questionnaires, semistructured interviews, desktop sources, focus group discussions, and remote sensing. It analyzed the strategies, scope, and relevance of Gokwe town disaster risk-reduction strategies and their integration into town planning and development using six wards, from 1992 to 2020. The Urban Disaster Reduction Index (UDRI) model was applied based on the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction indicators to measure the extent to which the town council’s development planning can help to reduce disaster and foster sustainable development. The UDRI was calculated for the four Sendai Framework priority areas and proved that the council’s disaster management is weak. The chief cause was found to be the town’s development control regulations and the national urban councils act that excludes contributions from local communities and leadership, placing new town planning in the hands of bureaucrats, technicians, and politicians only. It was concluded that for disaster management to improve requires local DRR and national urban development policies reformulation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Urban Planning and Developmenten_US
dc.subjectDisaster risk reductionen_US
dc.subject2030 Agenda for Sustainable Developmenten_US
dc.subjectNew Urban Agenda (NUA)en_US
dc.subjectUrban Planningen_US
dc.subjectGokwe, Zimbabween_US
dc.titleTown Planning and Development for Disaster Prevention: Insights from Gokwe Town, Zimbabween_US
dc.typeresearch articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000903-
dc.contributor.affiliationMidlands State University, Zimbabween_US
dc.contributor.affiliationMidlands State University, Zimbabween_US
dc.contributor.affiliationM.Phil Student, Midlands State Universityen_US
dc.relation.issn1943-5444en_US
dc.description.volume149en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetyperesearch article-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Town Planning and Development for Disaster Prevent.pdfAbstract66.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

140
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Download(s)

40
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.