Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5263
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarambanyika, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMutekwa, Timothyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKusena, Winmoreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T06:45:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-25T06:45:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5263-
dc.description.abstractOne of the major challenges to enhance food security amongst rural populations in developing countries including Zimbabwe is the continued existence of high postharvest losses, accompanied by low yields due to climate change, among other factors. It therefore becomes imperative to investigate the level of adoption and utilization of ethno-postharvest technologies in a bid to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses to safeguard yields before consumption. Data was collected in Buhera district through triangulation, which involved semi-structured interviews with five elderly people snowball sampled and purposively chosen Agritex officers as well as questionnaires administered to 100 purposively selected smallholder farmers. Crops and technology observations during fieldwork also constituted an important component of the data gathering techniques. Research results show that although some long established and effective traditional methods like “tsapi” were abandoned, there are some residual traditional technologies still in use such as drying on “ruware”, threshing of small grains by cattle trampling and storing all crops in a traditional hut called “hozi” with the aid of pest repellents like cactus ash. Major factors leading to the demise of most traditional technologies include the absence of suitable education and information dissemination structures and competition from vigorously promoted western methods among others. It was concluded that in order to effectively minimize postharvest losses, indigenous technologies must be studied, documented and promoted by both practitioners and external agencies such as Agritex, and non-governmental organizations. Where possible, they can be augmented by modern day technologies to reduce the costs of post harvest storage for marginalized and poorly resourced smallholder farmers in the area.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer, Dordrechten_US
dc.subjectEthno-postharvesten_US
dc.subjectPracticesen_US
dc.subjectFarmersen_US
dc.subjectSemi-arid areasen_US
dc.titleAdoption and Utilization of Ethno-postharvest Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in Semi-arid Regions of Zimbabwe: Case of Buhera Districten_US
dc.typebook parten_US
dc.relation.publicationScience, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System by Behnassi, M., Shahid, S. A., Habib, N. M.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_21-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabween_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabween_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabween_US
dc.relation.isbn978-94-007-7957-0en_US
dc.description.startpage307en_US
dc.description.endpage321en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypebook part-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248-
Appears in Collections:Book Chapters
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

170
checked on Nov 23, 2025

Download(s)

46
checked on Nov 23, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.