Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4501
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMakuvaro, Veronica-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Sue-
dc.contributor.authorMasere, Tirivashe Phillip-
dc.contributor.authorDimes, John-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-12T08:10:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-12T08:10:46Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn140-1963-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196318300491-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4501-
dc.description.abstractThe agriculture sector is sensitive to climate change and the capacity of smallholder farmers in developing countries to adapt is limited. Similar to adoption of any development-oriented strategies, perception is pre-requisite to successful adaptation of agricultural strategies against climate change effects. This study was conducted in the semi-arid Lower Gweru Communal area of Central Zimbabwe to sensitize smallholder farmers on climate change and to establish their perceptions of the projected climate of Zimbabwe by 2050. Data were collected during 2011 from a total of 60 farmers drawn from six villages in Mdubiwa and Nyama Wards. Farmers were selected using systematic random sampling from a households list and grouped into three wealth groups: resource rich; resource poor and intermediate. Focus Group Discussions were conducted with each group to investigate their perceptions of the projected climate by 2050 and their proposed adaptive strategies. Farmers perceived the projected climate to have negative effects on their livelihoods and there were no outstanding differences in the nature of responses across the three categories of farmers. Farmers’ responses showed that they were concerned about crop and livestock productivity as well as availability of water resources, food and nutrition security and about their general well-being. The intermediate wealth group, which had more than half of its members above 70 years of age provided the least number of ideas for adaptations. Farmers also suggested how they could possibly counteract some of the predicted negative effects or maximize on positive effects. Strategies that were suggested by the farmers were largely concerned with cropping and tended to address water shortages. It was concluded that almost all strategies suggested by farmers were self-directed, rather than directed at authorities like government or donors to do something for them thus showing that farmers had the will power to deal with climate change themselves.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Arid Environments, Vol.152 : p. 75 - 82;-
dc.subjectFuture climateen_US
dc.subjectSmallholder farmeren_US
dc.subjectPerceived effectsen_US
dc.subjectAdaptation strategiesen_US
dc.titleSmallholder farmer perceived effects of climate change on agricultural productivity and adaptation strategiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MAKUVARO.pdfAbstract111.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

56
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Download(s)

10
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.