Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1265
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Matunhu, Jephias | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-08T13:45:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-08T13:45:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2141-6672 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1381858116_Matunhu.pdf | - |
dc.description.abstract | The way states and development specialists rationalize how to commit economic resources to development is influenced, to a greater extent by their level of persuasion towards specific development theories. The discourse assesses the influence of modernization and dependency theories on Africa’s development. The conclusion is that both theories have failed to help develop Africa. The discourse pins hope on the African Renaissance theory of development. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Academic Journals | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | African Journal of History and Culture;Vol. 3(5), p. 65-72, | - |
dc.subject | Modernization, dependency, rural underdevelopment, | en_US |
dc.subject | African renaissance. | en_US |
dc.title | A critique of modernization and dependency theories in Africa: critical assessment | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Matunhu pdf - article1381858116_Matunhu.pdf | 271.57 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
130
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Download(s)
32
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.